Tag: law firm SEO

  • Another Google Update Is Coming. Here’s What To Do

    Another Google Update Is Coming. Here’s What To Do

    Is Google’s next core update already overdue? Based on Google’s own update history, the honest answer is: it’s due, not early. Google’s last core update ran from May 21 to June 2, 2026, and as of October 6, 2026, that is 138 days with no core update since. That gap already runs longer than Google’s typical pace between updates.

    Is Google Overdue For Another Core Update?

    From 2022 to 2025, Google averaged about 3.3 core updates per year, roughly one every three to four months. A firm that has gone 138 days without a core update is not ahead of that pace. It is behind it.

    What Is Happening Right Now?

    Google’s September 2026 spam update began September 24, 2026, and as of October 6 it was still listed as active, about 12 days into the rollout. Google itself said the process could take up to two weeks.

    Does An Active Spam Update Mean A Core Update Is Coming Next?

    Not reliably. A spam update does not reliably predict that a core update is next, but it does not make one less likely either. Google has a history of running the two close together. In March 2026, a core update began just three days after a spam update.

    Why Has 2026 Been Such An Active Year?

    Google announced four spam updates in 2026 alone, in March, June, August, and September. Compare that with one spam update in 2023, three in 2024, and one in 2025. By that measure, 2026 has been an unusually active year for Google algorithm activity, core updates included.

    What Should A Small Firm Actually Do About It?

    Stop trying to guess Google’s calendar. Every time rankings move, it is tempting to scroll for “which update hit me” and start rewriting pages around a theory. With four spam updates and no core update in over four months this year, there is always a plausible update to blame, which makes guessing easy and useless at the same time.

    Use the quiet stretch instead. The clearest advice on this comes from the source itself: watch Google’s Search Status Dashboard and official announcements, and treat the gap between updates as a measurement window for auditing content quality, rather than scrambling to explain a swing after it happens.

    For a small firm, that means building a running baseline in your own Google Search Console before the next update lands, not after.

    • Pull current traffic, impressions, clicks, and average position by page, and save a copy outside Search Console’s rolling data window.
    • Date it. When the next update is confirmed, you compare against this exact snapshot, not memory.
    • Audit your weakest pages now, while nothing is moving, instead of during a scramble later.

    Why Look Beyond Rankings At All?

    Rankings on a results page are the measure Google’s updates move most directly, and they matter. But a growing share of people ask an AI assistant for a recommendation instead of scanning a results page. Citation Share, the share of AI-assistant answers in your market that name your firm directly, is a separate visibility signal, one that does not rise or fall with any single Google algorithm change. It is worth tracking alongside your Search Console baseline, not instead of it.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Should I rewrite my site every time rankings move?

    No. Rankings fluctuate for ordinary reasons, and in a year with this many updates, there is almost always something to blame whether or not it actually caused the move. Check your baseline, traffic, impressions, clicks, and position over time, before you change anything.

    What is Citation Share?

    Citation Share is the percentage of AI-assistant answers in your market that mention your firm by name. It is a visibility metric your firm can track, not a guarantee of any outcome tied to a particular update or platform.

    Is this legal advice?

    No. This is informational commentary on search industry trends, not legal advice. Talk to your own counsel about matters specific to your firm.

    See where your own site stands before the next update hits: run it through SiteScan, a free tool that grades five pages and shows a before-and-after score in about two minutes, no card required.

  • Google Avoids Ad Tech Breakup, Gets 6-Year Oversight

    Google Avoids Ad Tech Breakup, Gets 6-Year Oversight

    A federal judge ruled on September 17, 2026 that Google will not be forced to sell off AdX, its ad exchange. Instead, Google must open that exchange to competitors and submit to six years of antitrust compliance monitoring. If you run a small law firm, here’s the short version: none of this touches how clients find you on Google.

    What did the judge actually rule?

    U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema issued a 106-page ruling that builds on her April 2025 finding that Google unlawfully monopolized online advertising technology. The DOJ and a group of state attorneys general wanted Google to sell AdX, its ad exchange. Brinkema said no to that. She wrote that “expanded access to AdX bids through competing publisher ad servers could provide an effective alternative to divestiture.” Google plans to appeal the underlying liability finding.

    Why didn’t Google get broken up?

    Instead of a forced sale, the court ordered structural changes to how Google’s ad-tech pieces talk to each other:

    • Google must separate the commercial requirements between its publisher ad server (DFP) and AdX, so a site using Google’s ad server no longer has to use AdX too.
    • Competing publisher ad servers get greater access to real-time bids from AdX.
    • An internal compliance monitor oversees Google for six years, well short of the fifteen years the DOJ had sought.

    Advertising makes up roughly 73% of Alphabet’s revenue, which is why a breakup was always the harder outcome for a court to order and the one Google fought hardest to avoid.

    What actually changes for publishers and advertisers?

    This ruling is about the programmatic display-ad exchange layer: the plumbing that auctions banner and display inventory across the open web. Big publishers and rival ad-server companies get more competitive access to AdX’s bidding data. That’s a real structural change, and it matters a lot if you build or sell ad-tech infrastructure.

    It has nothing to do with Google Search, Search campaigns, Google Business Profile, or local search rankings.

    Does this affect how law firms get found online?

    No. This is the part worth sitting with. The ruling reaches AdX and publisher ad servers, not Google Search, not AI Overviews, not Local Search, not Google Business Profile. Those are the systems that actually decide whether a prospective client finds a law firm. Google’s dominance there is fully intact, and nothing in this decision changes it.

    It’s easy to read a headline about a Google antitrust loss and assume something favorable just happened for small-business visibility. It didn’t. The court even avoided the one remedy, a breakup, that might have shaken up the ad ecosystem broadly. What’s left is a six-year compliance monitor for a business unit most law firms never touch.

    What should a small firm actually do about this?

    Don’t wait on courts, regulators, or antitrust appeals to change how clients find your firm. That work happens in Google Search results, AI assistant answers, and your own site’s structure, and it happens on your timeline, not a judge’s. If you want a clear read on where your site currently stands, run it through GrowthAgents’ free SiteScan tool. It’s a useful gut check while the ad-tech world sorts out AdX, because your actual visibility problem is almost certainly not an ad-exchange problem.

    FAQ

    Does this ruling affect Google Ads search campaigns?

    No. This case is about the AdX display-ad exchange and publisher ad servers, not Google Search Ads, Search results, or local listings.

    Is Google appealing?

    Google has said it plans to appeal the underlying liability finding, so this isn’t the final word.

    Is this legal advice?

    No. This post is informational commentary on a public ruling, not legal advice. Talk to counsel for anything specific to your firm.

    Want a clear, free read on how your site actually shows up for prospects right now? Run GrowthAgents’ free SiteScan and see where the weakest page stands before and after a rewrite.