Category: Digital Marketing

  • Google Ads Now Auto-Adds Promotions. Here’s The Opt-Out

    Google Ads Now Auto-Adds Promotions. Here’s The Opt-Out

    Starting October 12, 2026, Google began auto-enrolling some Search and Performance Max advertisers — specifically those with linked location assets — into a new feature called “Automated Promotions,” according to Search Engine Roundtable. The system scans your website for anything that looks like a deal and attaches it to your ad as a promotion asset, without a human reviewing the wording first. If you run Google Search Ads or Performance Max for a law firm or professional services business, you are very likely enrolled right now, by default.

    What Is Google Actually Turning On Here?

    Per Search Engine Roundtable’s October 5, 2026 report, Google’s own advertiser email describes Automated Promotions as a feature “designed to improve your ad’s performance by providing users with valid offers without requiring any manual setup on your part.” In practice, that means Google’s crawler reads your website, looks for language it interprets as a promotion, deal, or coupon, and inserts it into your ad as a promotion asset — automatically, continuously, and without a review step on your end.

    Why Should A Law Firm Care More Than A Retailer Does?

    A retailer auto-surfacing “20% off” is a pricing question. A law firm auto-surfacing fee language is a regulatory one. Most state bars regulate exactly how firms can advertise fee arrangements, guarantees, and free offers — required disclaimers on contingency fees, restrictions on words like “free” or “guaranteed,” rules on what a “no fee unless we win” claim has to say nearby. None of that nuance travels with an automated scrape. Google’s system is matching patterns that look like offers, not applying your bar’s advertising rules.

    What Might Google’s Crawler Flag As A “Promotion” On Your Site?

    This is the part most firms miss, because they don’t think of themselves as running promotions at all. Common website language that could read as a “deal” to an automated system includes:

    • “Free consultation” or “free case review”
    • “No fee unless we win” or other contingency-fee framing
    • A flat-fee offer for a specific service (uncontested divorce, simple will, etc.)
    • Seasonal or limited-time discount language on a services page
    • Any banner or callout mentioning a reduced rate, waived fee, or percent off

    Any of these, pulled verbatim into an ad asset with no disclaimer and no review, is the exposure here — not that Google built the feature, but that it can go live unreviewed.

    Is This Opt-In Or Opt-Out — And Did Everyone Get Notified?

    Search Engine Roundtable reports that Automated Promotions is opt-out, not opt-in: advertisers are enrolled by default unless they turn it off in account-level Automated Assets settings. The rollout is also phased — only some advertisers have received Google’s notification email so far, which means plenty of accounts are already enrolled with no notice at all. One built-in limit: campaigns that already have promotion assets manually attached are excluded from auto-enrollment, per the same report.

    Where Do You Actually Turn This Off?

    The control lives at the account level, in Google Ads’ Automated Assets settings — not inside an individual campaign. That’s worth knowing before you go looking for a per-campaign toggle that doesn’t exist. If you or your agency manage Search or Performance Max campaigns with location assets attached, that settings page is where this gets decided, one way or the other.

    Should You Panic About This?

    No. This is a settings-check story, not a crisis. The feature isn’t malicious, and Google isn’t targeting law firms specifically — it’s a broad ad-performance feature that happens to collide with a regulated industry. The move is simple: go look at your Automated Assets settings, decide deliberately whether to opt in or stay out, and if you do leave it on, check what it’s pulling from your site on a regular basis rather than assuming it’s fine.

    Does this apply to Local Services Ads too?

    The reporting specifically describes Search and Performance Max campaigns with linked location assets — not Local Services Ads directly. If your firm runs LSAs, it’s still worth confirming with whoever manages your account whether any linked Search or Performance Max campaigns are in scope.

    Will an auto-added promotion get my ad rejected, or put my bar license at risk?

    There’s no indication this triggers ad rejection on its own. The exposure is advertising-compliance risk if the auto-pulled language runs afoul of your state bar’s rules on fee advertising — not a platform penalty. Check your own state bar’s advertising rules, and talk to your own counsel if you’re unsure where a specific phrase lands. This article is informational commentary, not legal advice.

    Can I switch this off for one campaign and leave it on for others?

    Based on current reporting, the control is account-level, not per-campaign. If any of your Search or Performance Max campaigns carry linked location assets, the account-wide setting will govern all of them.

    What if I’m already running promotion assets on my ads?

    Per Search Engine Roundtable, campaigns that already have promotion assets manually attached are excluded from auto-enrollment — so firms that already manage this deliberately are, for now, in the clear on those specific campaigns.

    If you’re checking your Google Ads settings anyway, it’s worth checking what’s actually living on your website, too — because that’s the raw material Google’s crawler is reading. SiteScan, a free tool from GrowthAgents, grades five pages of your site, rewrites your weakest page, and shows you a before-and-after score in about two minutes, no card required. It won’t tell you what Google’s ad crawler will do with your copy, but it will tell you what that copy is actually saying — which is the first thing worth knowing either way.

  • Google Avoids Ad Tech Breakup, Gets 6-Year Oversight

    Google Avoids Ad Tech Breakup, Gets 6-Year Oversight

    A federal judge ruled on September 17, 2026 that Google will not be forced to sell off AdX, its ad exchange. Instead, Google must open that exchange to competitors and submit to six years of antitrust compliance monitoring. If you run a small law firm, here’s the short version: none of this touches how clients find you on Google.

    What did the judge actually rule?

    U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema issued a 106-page ruling that builds on her April 2025 finding that Google unlawfully monopolized online advertising technology. The DOJ and a group of state attorneys general wanted Google to sell AdX, its ad exchange. Brinkema said no to that. She wrote that “expanded access to AdX bids through competing publisher ad servers could provide an effective alternative to divestiture.” Google plans to appeal the underlying liability finding.

    Why didn’t Google get broken up?

    Instead of a forced sale, the court ordered structural changes to how Google’s ad-tech pieces talk to each other:

    • Google must separate the commercial requirements between its publisher ad server (DFP) and AdX, so a site using Google’s ad server no longer has to use AdX too.
    • Competing publisher ad servers get greater access to real-time bids from AdX.
    • An internal compliance monitor oversees Google for six years, well short of the fifteen years the DOJ had sought.

    Advertising makes up roughly 73% of Alphabet’s revenue, which is why a breakup was always the harder outcome for a court to order and the one Google fought hardest to avoid.

    What actually changes for publishers and advertisers?

    This ruling is about the programmatic display-ad exchange layer: the plumbing that auctions banner and display inventory across the open web. Big publishers and rival ad-server companies get more competitive access to AdX’s bidding data. That’s a real structural change, and it matters a lot if you build or sell ad-tech infrastructure.

    It has nothing to do with Google Search, Search campaigns, Google Business Profile, or local search rankings.

    Does this affect how law firms get found online?

    No. This is the part worth sitting with. The ruling reaches AdX and publisher ad servers, not Google Search, not AI Overviews, not Local Search, not Google Business Profile. Those are the systems that actually decide whether a prospective client finds a law firm. Google’s dominance there is fully intact, and nothing in this decision changes it.

    It’s easy to read a headline about a Google antitrust loss and assume something favorable just happened for small-business visibility. It didn’t. The court even avoided the one remedy, a breakup, that might have shaken up the ad ecosystem broadly. What’s left is a six-year compliance monitor for a business unit most law firms never touch.

    What should a small firm actually do about this?

    Don’t wait on courts, regulators, or antitrust appeals to change how clients find your firm. That work happens in Google Search results, AI assistant answers, and your own site’s structure, and it happens on your timeline, not a judge’s. If you want a clear read on where your site currently stands, run it through GrowthAgents’ free SiteScan tool. It’s a useful gut check while the ad-tech world sorts out AdX, because your actual visibility problem is almost certainly not an ad-exchange problem.

    FAQ

    Does this ruling affect Google Ads search campaigns?

    No. This case is about the AdX display-ad exchange and publisher ad servers, not Google Search Ads, Search results, or local listings.

    Is Google appealing?

    Google has said it plans to appeal the underlying liability finding, so this isn’t the final word.

    Is this legal advice?

    No. This post is informational commentary on a public ruling, not legal advice. Talk to counsel for anything specific to your firm.

    Want a clear, free read on how your site actually shows up for prospects right now? Run GrowthAgents’ free SiteScan and see where the weakest page stands before and after a rewrite.

  • Clients Still Want a Real Person, Not AI

    Clients Still Want a Real Person, Not AI

    No. A new consumer survey says the opposite of what cost-cutting software vendors are selling small firms: when it comes to actually talking to your law firm, clients want a human, not a bot. Put AI anywhere near the first hello, and you risk the relationship before it starts.

    What did the new survey actually find?

    LEX Reception, working with OnePoll, surveyed 6,000 consumers and tracked attitudes toward AI in legal client service from October 2025 to September 2026. The trend line only moved one direction: away from AI.

    The loyalty and reputation numbers are harder to ignore. 58% say a human receptionist signals genuine care, and 45% say it signals professionalism. Two-thirds report more loyalty to firms that use human staff exclusively. And the review gap is stark: 55% leave a positive review after a human interaction, versus just 8% after an AI one.

    Why does AI still fail at the first hello?

    People calling a lawyer are usually anxious, not curious. A custody dispute, an injury, a business dispute in motion — these aren’t moments where someone wants to practice prompting a chatbot. They want to know a person heard them. That’s not a technology gap AI closes with a better script. It’s the actual job of that first contact.

    So should law firms avoid AI altogether?

    No — that’s the wrong lesson. The survey is a warning about where AI sits, not whether a firm uses it. Put AI in front of the client at the moment of contact and you lose trust, reviews, and loyalty. Put AI behind the scenes, where the client never sees it, and none of those risks apply.

    Where does AI actually help a law firm?

    Everywhere the client isn’t watching:

    • Researching and drafting content that answers the questions prospective clients are already asking.
    • Monitoring how the firm shows up when someone asks an AI assistant like ChatGPT or Gemini for a lawyer — what GrowthAgents tracks as Citation Share, the percentage of AI-assistant answers in a firm’s market that name the firm.
    • Auditing and improving the firm’s website so it’s actually findable before anyone picks up the phone.
    • Following up on marketing tasks that used to fall through the cracks between a busy attorney’s calendar.

    None of that touches the phone. The client still reaches a person. The AI just makes sure the right people are reaching out in the first place.

    What should solo and small firms do now?

    Keep a human on intake and phones — full stop, the data says this is non-negotiable. Then let a team of agents handle the invisible half of growth: the content, the visibility work, the research your firm doesn’t have hours for. That’s the actual split GrowthAgents is built around — your client-development team of agents working in the background, your staff handling every real conversation.

    A fast way to see where your own site stands: run it through SiteScan. It’s a free tool that grades your site across five pages and rewrites the weakest one, showing you a before-and-after score.

    Is this survey about all AI, or just phone and chat?

    The LEX Reception survey focuses on AI at the point of client contact — phone systems and chat-style interactions. It doesn’t address AI used for research, content, or back-office marketing work, which clients never interact with directly.

    Does this mean firms should never automate anything?

    No. It means don’t automate the conversation. Automating the work that leads up to the conversation — research, content, visibility tracking — carries none of the trust risk this survey measured.

    Is this legal advice?

    No. This post is informational and reflects marketing and client-service research, not legal advice. Talk to your own counsel about how client communication policies apply to your firm.

    See where your site stands with a free SiteScan.

  • Google’s September 2026 Spam Update: What to Check

    Google’s September 2026 Spam Update: What to Check

    Google began rolling out a global spam update on September 24, 2026, at 9:15 a.m. PDT. It targets search spam, not overall ranking quality — so if your site plays it straight, this isn’t the update to lose sleep over. But it’s running longer than usual, and “longer” is worth a few sensible checks.

    What did Google actually roll out?

    Google’s Search Status Dashboard says the update “applies globally and to all languages” and “may take up to two weeks to complete,” according to Search Engine Journal’s report on September 24, 2026. Google didn’t name a specific spam policy or tactic it’s targeting — just “notable improvements” to its spam-detection systems. That vagueness is normal for spam updates. It’s still a little annoying if you’re the one staring at a traffic graph.

    Why is this one taking so long?

    Context matters here. Per the same Search Engine Journal report, the March 2026 spam update finished in 19 hours and 30 minutes. June’s took 2 days and 1 hour. August’s took 2 days and 16 hours. This one is budgeted for up to two weeks — by far the longest spam rollout of the year. That doesn’t necessarily mean it’s bigger or more aggressive. It could just mean Google is rolling it out more cautiously. Either way, expect rankings to move around more than usual while it’s live.

    Is this a core update wearing a disguise?

    No. Core updates reassess overall relevance and quality across the board. Spam updates specifically target manipulative tactics — things like scaled low-quality content, cloaking, link schemes, or scraped and spun pages. If your site doesn’t do any of that, a spam update isn’t supposed to touch you. The honest answer is Google hasn’t told anyone exactly what this one is hunting for, so nobody can promise you’re untouched. What we can tell you is what to check.

    What should you check if you notice a ranking change?

    Before you assume you were “hit,” rule out the boring explanations first:

    • Pull up Search Console. Look at clicks, impressions, and average position for your key pages over the last two weeks, not just today. A one-day dip is noise. A multi-week decline across many pages is a signal.
    • Check for manual actions. Search Console’s Security & Manual Actions section will say so directly if Google flagged something on your site.
    • Audit your own content honestly. Any AI-generated pages with no real editing? Thin location pages built just to rank? Duplicate content across service pages? These are the usual spam-update targets.
    • Look at your backlink profile. A sudden pile of low-quality or paid links pointing at your site — even ones you didn’t build yourself — can draw unwanted attention.
    • Compare the timeline. Did your dip start on or after September 24? If it started two weeks earlier, this update isn’t your explanation.

    Why shouldn’t you panic over normal fluctuation?

    Rankings move constantly — competitors publish, seasonal demand shifts, Google tests things. A law firm or professional-services site watching daily position changes during a two-week rollout window will see noise and mistake it for a verdict. Rewriting pages in a panic, disavowing links you don’t understand, or nuking content based on a 2-day dip usually does more damage than the update itself. Slower, steadier diagnosis beats a reactive overhaul every time.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How long will the September 2026 spam update take?

    Google says up to two weeks from the September 24 start, per its Search Status Dashboard.

    Will this affect small law firm and professional-services sites?

    It can affect any site, but it specifically targets spam tactics — not general content or site quality. A site with original, accurate, well-maintained pages has little reason for concern.

    Can you tell me definitively if my site was hit?

    No single outside piece can tell you that — Google hasn’t published enough detail to say for certain in any individual case. The checklist above is the honest way to investigate your own data.

    Should I change anything on my site right now?

    Only if your own Search Console data and content audit point to a real issue. Otherwise, wait out the rollout and keep watching your numbers.

    Not sure where your site actually stands, update or no update? Run it through SiteScan, GrowthAgents’ free tool that grades your site across five pages and rewrites the weakest one — a clear-eyed look at your site’s health, independent of whatever any single algorithm change is doing this month.

    This post is general SEO and marketing information, not legal advice.

  • Marketing Spend Is Up. Law Firm Accountability Isn’t.

    Marketing Spend Is Up. Law Firm Accountability Isn’t.

    <p>Law firm spending is climbing fast. Marketing budgets, tech stacks, knowledge-management tools — all up. Accountability for that spending hasn’t moved at the same pace. That gap, not the latest AI-native competitor or algorithm update, is the real risk sitting in front of your firm right now.</p>

    <h2>How much are firms actually spending?</h2>
    <p>A lot more than last year. A <a href=”https://xira.com/p/2026/09/30/law-firm-marketing-spending-rises-but-accountability-gap-widens/”>September 30, 2026 industry report</a> pulled together several surveys, and the pattern holds across all of them. The Wells Fargo Legal Specialty Group surveyed more than 140 firms and found average revenue at large U.S. firms rose 12.4% in the first half of 2026, while expenses rose 9.6% over the same period, as <a href=”https://xira.com/p/2026/09/30/law-firm-marketing-spending-rises-but-accountability-gap-widens/”>reported September 30, 2026</a>. Revenue is outrunning expense growth. Firms are willing to spend to keep it that way.</p>

    <h2>Where is that money going?</h2>
    <p>Technology and knowledge management, mostly. Thomson Reuters Institute and Georgetown Law’s 2026 Report on the State of the U.S. Legal Market, cited in the <a href=”https://xira.com/p/2026/09/30/law-firm-marketing-spending-rises-but-accountability-gap-widens/”>September 30, 2026 report</a>, found technology spending up 9.7% and knowledge-management spending up 10.5% in 2025. Firms aren’t dabbling. They’re building infrastructure. Clio’s 2025 Legal Trends Report, also cited there, found 79% of legal professionals now use AI in their firms — and growing firms use it at twice the rate of stable or shrinking ones.</p>

    <h2>Does spending more on tech actually pay off?</h2>
    <p>Sometimes. The same Thomson Reuters and Georgetown research, referenced in the <a href=”https://xira.com/p/2026/09/30/law-firm-marketing-spending-rises-but-accountability-gap-widens/”>September 30, 2026 analysis</a>, found firms with a visible AI strategy were 3.9 times as likely to see at least one form of ROI than firms without one. “At least one form of ROI” is doing a lot of work in that sentence. It’s not a guarantee. It’s a correlation between having a strategy at all and seeing some benefit, measured somehow, by someone.</p>

    <h2>So what’s the actual gap here?</h2>
    <p>It’s not that firms are spending blindly. It’s that spending and reporting are growing at different speeds. Budgets scale every year. Verification doesn’t. A firm can raise its marketing line item every quarter and still not answer a simple question: what, specifically, is this money producing that we can point to and prove? Vendors hand over dashboards full of “engagement,” “visibility,” and “ROI” — language that sounds like accountability without being built from anything you can independently check.</p>

    <h2>Why does this matter more now than it used to?</h2>
    <p>Because the stakes are higher. Revenue is up, expenses are up, and the money flowing into marketing and technology is no longer a rounding error. It’s a real decision, made every budget cycle. A managing partner approving another spend increase deserves better than a vendor’s self-reported summary. They deserve numbers they can open in their own account and check for themselves.</p>

    <h2>What should you actually ask your marketing vendor for?</h2>
    <p>Ask for the metrics that live in tools you already control: organic traffic, search impressions, keyword rankings, click-through rate. These come straight out of Google Search Console, not a vendor’s internal reporting layer. If a vendor can’t show you a number inside a system you own, it isn’t proof. It’s a claim.</p>
    <ul>
    <li>Traffic: is organic traffic to your site trending up or down, and on which pages?</li>
    <li>Impressions: is your firm showing up more often in search results for the terms that matter?</li>
    <li>Rankings: are specific pages moving up or down for specific keywords?</li>
    <li>Clicks: are people actually clicking through, and from where?</li>
    </ul>
    <p>Notice what’s missing: which post “produced” a client. No credible reporting system can show you that, and any vendor that claims it can is selling a story, not a dashboard.</p>

    <h2>Frequently asked questions</h2>

    <h3>Does more marketing spend mean more clients?</h3>
    <p>Not automatically. Revenue and expense growth are both up industry-wide, but that’s a market-level trend, not proof that any one marketing dollar produced any one client. Spend and outcome are two separate questions — treat them that way.</p>

    <h3>What’s a reasonable reporting standard to demand?</h3>
    <p>Numbers you can verify in a tool you control, like Google Search Console or your site’s own analytics. Traffic, impressions, rankings, and clicks are provable. “Brand lift” and “engagement score” usually aren’t.</p>

    <h3>Is AI adoption itself the differentiator?</h3>
    <p>Having a visible strategy correlates with seeing some ROI, per the Thomson Reuters and Georgetown data above. But adoption alone isn’t the point. What you can measure from it is.</p>

    <h3>Is this legal advice?</h3>
    <p>No. This is general commentary on industry spending and reporting trends, not legal or financial advice for your firm.</p>

    <p>Before you approve another marketing line-item increase, find out what you can actually verify about the one you already have. <a href=”https://growthagents.ai/sitescan”>Run your site through SiteScan</a> — it’s free, it grades your site across five pages, and it hands you numbers you can check yourself, not a vendor’s summary of itself.</p>

  • Google LSAs Move Into Google Ads: A Law Firm Checklist

    Google LSAs Move Into Google Ads: A Law Firm Checklist

    Google is merging Local Services Ads into Google Ads, turning LSA into a pay-per-lead campaign type inside Performance Max. Rollout started in August 2026 and continues in phases through 2027. The part most firms miss: your old LSA performance reports do not move with you, so the real checklist starts before your account migrates, not after.

    What Is Actually Changing?

    The core mechanics of LSA stay the same. Ads remain keywordless, they still appear only in Search and Maps, and firms still pay per lead rather than per click (ALM Corp, July 27, 2026; PinMeTo, August 27, 2026). What changes is where you manage it. LSA campaigns move into the main Google Ads interface, alongside Search and Shopping campaigns, instead of living in a separate dashboard (ALM Corp, July 27, 2026).

    Bidding and budgeting change with it. Manual, service-category-level cost-per-lead bidding goes away, replaced by a single campaign-level target cost per lead. Weekly budgets become daily budgets (Consultwebs, August 24, 2026). Your Google Business Profile now syncs directly and in real time into the live ad — business details and photos update automatically (ALM Corp, July 27, 2026; Consultwebs, August 24, 2026). BBB ratings can no longer run as ad callouts, so firms need a different trust signal — think years of experience or a free consultation line (Consultwebs, August 24, 2026). And starting October 1, 2026, certain missed calls during business hours lasting beyond roughly 20 seconds start counting as billable leads (PinMeTo, August 27, 2026).

    When Does This Hit Your Firm?

    Migration is rolling out in waves: a limited set of U.S. categories in phase one (August 2026), broader advertiser groups and custom setups in phase two (late 2026), and non-U.S. accounts plus remaining categories in phase three (2027) (PinMeTo, August 27, 2026; ALM Corp, July 27, 2026). Firms get roughly two weeks’ notice before their account transfers (Consultwebs, August 24, 2026). Law firms weren’t named in the first wave — that means later timing, not no timing.

    What Should Be On Your Pre-Migration Checklist?

    Hand this to whoever runs your Google account — in-house marketer, agency, or you:

    • Export every LSA performance report you can reach now, covering at least the past 12 to 24 months. Google has said historical reports will not carry over to the new dashboard (Consultwebs, August 24, 2026; PinMeTo, August 27, 2026; ALM Corp, July 27, 2026).
    • Confirm who holds login access to both the LSA and Google Ads accounts. If different people manage each today, get them on the same page before the merge.
    • Decide your target cost per lead now, at the campaign level, rather than letting Google default it when custom bidding disappears.
    • Shift budget planning from weekly to daily thinking.
    • Audit your Google Business Profile — once it syncs live into ads, outdated hours or photos go public immediately.
    • Swap any BBB-rating callouts for an alternative trust signal before they’re disabled.
    • Brief whoever answers your phones on the October 1, 2026 call-charging change, since a missed or slow-answered call can now become a billable lead.
    • Calendar the two-week migration notice so it reaches a person, not an inbox no one checks.

    What Does The New Reporting Tell You About Lead Quality?

    Inside Google Ads, you’ll still see lead volume, cost per lead, service category, and call or booking counts. After October 1, 2026, you’ll also see which missed calls were billed as leads — useful, search-console-provable data: impressions, clicks, lead counts.

    What it still won’t tell you is whether any of those leads became a client. Google’s dashboard, before or after migration, has never reported whether a lead retained the firm or what it was worth. Performance Max’s automated bidding, if anything, surfaces less detail than the standalone LSA dashboard did. That gap between “lead” and “client” has always sat outside Google’s reporting, and it still does.

    What Should You Ask A Marketing Partner About This?

    That gap is the real question for anyone managing your firm’s digital presence — not just whoever runs your ads. Ask whether they can follow a lead’s source consistently, no matter which Google console or campaign type it came through, or whether their reporting stops the moment a click or call gets attributed to a campaign. That distinction matters more while LSA and Google Ads reporting are briefly out of sync.

    It’s the approach we build GrowthAgents around: client-development software that helps firms get in front of the people searching for them, backed by a team of agents keeping that visibility consistent — not a replacement for your own intake tracking, but a partner that takes the question of where leads come from seriously.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Do I need to do anything if my firm hasn’t run LSA ads yet?

    Not for this migration specifically. But if you’re considering LSA, know that new accounts are likely being set up directly inside Google Ads rather than the old standalone dashboard.

    Will my cost per lead change after migration?

    The pay-per-lead model isn’t going away, but bidding moves from service-category-level control to a single campaign-level target. Set that target deliberately rather than accepting a default.

    Does this migration create any bar advertising compliance issues?

    Possibly, around the removal of BBB callouts and any claims tied to booking or response-time features. This is general information, not legal advice — check your state bar’s advertising rules or talk to ethics counsel about anything specific to your jurisdiction.

    What if my firm’s migration notice already arrived?

    Export your historical reports immediately, before the transfer date in that notice. Once the account moves, the old dashboard and its data may no longer be reachable.

    Want a clearer read on where your firm’s site and visibility stand heading into this change? Run a free scan at growthagents.ai/sitescan and see what’s working before your next ad dollar is spent.